Vaccines and nephrotic syndrome: efficacy and safety.

Vaccines represent the most important medical evolution in the last two centuries allowing prevention and formally eradication of a wide number of infectious diseases. Safety and effectiveness are main issues that still require an open discussion. A few clinical reports described a critical temporal relationship between vaccination and acute nephrotic syndrome, indirectly suggesting an association. For this review, the literature was reviewed to identify articles reporting associations of nephrotic syndrome with vaccines against a vast array of infectious diseases (including bacteria, virus and Sars-Cov-2). As specific aims, we evaluated effectiveness and safety in terms of occurrence of either "de novo" nephrotic syndrome in health subjects or "relapse" in those already affected by the disease. In total, 377 articles were found; 166 duplicates and 71 non-full text, animal studies or non-English language were removed. After excluding another 50 articles not containing relevant data on generic side effects or on relapses or new onset nephrotic syndrome, 90 articles met the search criteria. Overall, studies reported the effect of vaccines in 1015 patients, plus 4 nationwide epidemiologic investigations. Limited experience on vaccination of NS patients with measles, mumps, and rubella live attenuated vaccines does not allow any definitive conclusion on their safeness. VZV has been administered more frequently without side effects. Vaccines utilizing virus inactivated, recombinant, and toxoid can be utilized without risks in NS. Vaccines for influenza reduce the risk of infections during the pandemic and are associated with reduced risk of relapse of NS typically induced by the infection. Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 (all kinds) offer a concrete approach to reduce the pandemic. "De novo" NS or recurrence are very rare and respond to common therapies.

Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in dialysis and kidney transplantation.

Despite progressive improvements in the management of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), individuals with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are still at high risk of infection-related complications. Although the risk of infection in these patients is comparable to that of the general population, their lower rate of response to vaccination is a matter of concern. When prevention strategies fail, infection is often severe. Comorbidities affecting patients on maintenance dialysis and kidney transplant recipients clearly account for the increased risk of severe COVID-19, while the role of uremia and chronic immunosuppression is less clear. Immune monitoring studies have identified differences in the innate and adaptive immune response against the virus that could contribute to the increased disease severity. In particular, individuals on dialysis show signs of T cell exhaustion that may impair antiviral response. Similar to kidney transplant recipients, antibody production in these patients occurs, but with delayed kinetics compared with the general population, leaving them more exposed to viral expansion during the early phases of infection. Overall, unique features of the immune response during COVID-19 in individuals with ESKD may occur with severe comorbidities affecting these individuals in explaining their poor outcomes.

Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in dialysis and kidney transplantation

Despite progressive improvements in the management of patients with COVID-19, individuals with end stage kidney disease are still at high risk of infection-related complications. Although the risk of infection in these patients is comparable to the general population, their lower rate of response to vaccination is a matter of concern. When prevention strategies fail, infection is often severe. Comorbidities affecting patients on maintenance dialysis and kidney transplant recipients clearly account for the increased risk of severe COVID-19, while the role of uremia and chronic immunosuppression is less clear. Immune monitoring studies have identified differences in the innate and adaptive immune response against the virus that could contribute to the increased disease severity. In particular, individuals on dialysis show signs of T cell exhaustion that may impair anti-viral response. Similar to kidney transplant recipients, antibody production in these patients occurs, but with delayed kinetics compared to the general population, leaving them more exposed to viral expansion during the early phases of infection. Overall, unique features of the immune response during COVID-19 in individuals with end-stage kidney disease may concur with severe comorbidities affecting these individuals in explaining their poor outcomes.

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome relapse following COVID-19 vaccination: a series of 25 cases.

Background: Several cases of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) relapse following the administration of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have recently been reported, raising questions about the potential relationship between the immune response to COVID-19 vaccination and INS pathogenesis. Methods: We performed a retrospective multicentre survey describing the clinical and biological characteristics of patients presenting a relapse of INS after COVID-19 vaccination, with an assessment of outcome under treatment. Results: We identified 25 patients (16 men and 9 women) presenting a relapse within 1 month of a COVID-19 vaccine injection. The glomerular disease was of childhood onset in half of the patients and most patients (21/25) had received at least one immunosuppressive drug in addition to steroids for frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (NS). All patients were in a stable condition at the time of injection and 11 had no specific treatment. In five patients, the last relapse was reported >5 years before vaccine injection. The Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine was used in 80% of the patients. In 18 cases, INS relapse occurred after the first injection, a mean of 17.5 days after vaccination. A second injection was nevertheless administered in 14 of these patients. Five relapses occurred after administration of the second dose and two relapses after the administration of the third dose. All but one of the patients received steroids as first-line treatment, with an additional immunosuppressive agent in nine cases. During follow-up, complete remission was achieved in 21 patients, within 1 month in 17 cases. Only one patient had not achieved at least partial remission after 3 months of follow-up. Conclusions: This case series suggests that, in rare patients, COVID-19 vaccination may trigger INS relapse that is generally easy to control. These findings should encourage physicians to persuade their patients to complete the COVID-19 vaccination schedule.

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome relapse following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a series of 25 cases

Graphical